Preview

Disinfectology

Advanced search

The Housefly Musca domestica: Evolution of Insecticide Resistance in Russia (Literature Review)

https://doi.org/10.47470/dez019

EDN: PEKGVT

Abstract

When studying insect resistance to insecticides, it is important to use standard, susceptible laboratory cultures as a reference. Such a culture is the S-NIID housefly culture, reared in the insectary of the Institute of Disinfection for over 30 years. The S-NIID culture exhibits similar levels of insecticide sensitivity to other susceptible cultures maintained in scientific laboratories worldwide, such as SSS, WHO, Perm-S, and others. This retrospective study describes the resistance to housefly populations in Russia to active ingredients from various chemical groups. Data on housefly resistance to organochlorine and organophosphorus compounds, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, and phenylpyrazoles applied topically are presented. A mosaic pattern of resistance development is confirmed, linked not to the geographic location of insect collection points, but to the history of insecticide use at specific sites. An increase in resistance to pyrethroids, phenylpyrazoles, and neonicotinoids, a decrease in resistance to organophosphorus compounds were observed in the European part of Russia. Resistance to acetamiprid, tolerance, and high resistance to pyrethroids and other compounds was observed in the Tyumen region. The dynamics of resistance levels reflect the intensity of application of a particular group of insecticides during a given time period.

Conclusion. Housefly populations resistant to a number of insecticides has been identified in various regions of Russia. Rotation of active ingredients based on their mechanisms of action on insects is recommended.

Study limitations. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate housefly resistance to insecticides and is of interest to specialists involved in disinfection and pest control.

Contributions:
Eremina O.Yu. — selection of literature and writing the first version of the article, approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article;
Olifer V.V. — text editing, addition and approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article.
All co-authors — conducted entomological and toxicological studies, wrote and edited the text, approved the final version of the article, and are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the article.

Funding source. This study was not supported by any external sources of funding.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

Received: 10.03.2026 / Accepted: 21.07.2026 / Published: 10.08.2026

About the Authors

Olga Yu. Eremina
Institute of Disinfection, F.F. Erisman Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Biol.), leading researcher, Institute of Disinfectology, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: eremina_insect@mail.ru



Veronika V. Olifer
Institute of Disinfection, F.F. Erisman Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), leading researcher, Institute of Disinfectology, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: olifer.vv@fncg.ru



References

1. Eremina O.Yu. Insects — mechanical vectors of pathogens causing human infectious diseases (literature review). Disinfection Affairs. 2020; (3): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.35411/2076-457X-2020-1-37-54 https://elibrary.ru/ppbfgy (In Russ.)

2. Sulaiman I.M., Jacobs E., Simpson S., Kerdahi K. Identification of 18 vector species belonging to Group I, Group II, and Group III "Dirty 22' species known to contaminate food and spread foodborne pathogens: DNA barcoding study of public health importance. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2017; 37(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758416000217 https://elibrary.ru/yxmqef

3. Hafez A.M. First evaluation of field evolved resistance to commonly used insecticides in house fly populations from Saudi Arabian dairy farms. Insects. 2021; 12(12): 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121120 https://elibrary.ru/uvvilp

4. Khan H.A.A. Characterization of permethrin resistance in a Musca domestica strain: Resistance development, cross-resistance potential and realized heritability. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019; 75: 2969–2974. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5409 https://elibrary.ru/nvnrtk

5. Abbas N., Abubakar M., Hassan M.W., et al. Risk assessment of flonicamid resistance in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae): Resistance monitoring, inheritance, and cross-resistance potential. J. Med. Entomol. 2021; 58: 1779–1787. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjab036 https://elibrary.ru/crnhfj

6. Sparks T.C., Crossthwaite A.J., Nauen R., et al. Insecticides, biologics and nematicides: updates to IRAC's mode of action classification — a tool for resistance management. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020; 167: 104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104587 https://elibrary.ru/ztiajj

7. Mota-Sanchez D., Wise J.C. The Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database. 2026. URL: https://www.pesticideresistance.org/search.php

8. Zhang Y., Guo M., Ma Z., et al. Esterase-mediated spinosad resistance in house flies Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). Ecotoxicology. 2020; 29(1): 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02125-y https://elibrary.ru/sgxufb

9. Cetin H., Yanikoglu A., Akarsu E., et al. Monitoring of thiamethoxam resistance in Turkish house fly strains, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Arthropod Borne Dis. 2023; 17(3): 206–213. https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v17i3.14982 https://elibrary.ru/mxtpbk

10. Khan H.A.A. Lack of fitness costs associated with resistance to permethrin in Musca domestica. Sci. Rep. 2024; 14(1): 245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50469-7 https://elibrary.ru/swbako

11. Determination of the level of sensitivity of arthropods of medical significance to insectoacaricides: methodological guidelines MU 3.5.2.4105-24. Moscow; 2024. (In Russ.)

12. Sokolyanskaya M.P., Amirkhanov D.V. Dynamics of the formation of resistance of the housefly to insecticides from different chemical classes. Plant Protection Bulletin. 2008; (4): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.31993/1727-1320 https://elibrary.ru/kaummp (In Russ.)

13. Sukhoruchenko G.I., Dolzhenko V.I., Gannibal F.B., et al. Resistance of harmful arthropods, phytopathogenic fungi and rodents to pesticides. St. Petersburg; 2024. 672 p. https://elibrary.ru/thepjl (In Russ.)

14. Derbeneva-Ukhova V.P., Morozova V.P. A case of the emergence of DDT resistance in the housefly. Medical Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases. 1950; 19(5): 464–467. (In Russ.)

15. Sukhova M.N., Gvozdeva I.V., Misnik M.M., et al. Susceptibility to chlorophos, trichlormetaphos, metaphos, DDT, HCH, and polychloropinene in housefly populations after long-term use of these insecticides. Hygiene, Microbiology and Epidemiology. 1965; (8): 7–13. (In Russ.)

16. Roslavtseva S.A. Resistance to insectoacaricides in arthropods of epidemiological and sanitary-hygienic significance. Moscow; 2006. https://elibrary.ru/qlnznb (In Russ.)

17. Sukhova M.N., Gvozdeva I.V., Teterovskaya T.O., et al. On the population size of synanthropic flies in various regions of the USSR and ways of their further destruction. In: Problems of Parasitology. Kyiv; 1972; 2: 311–312. (In Russ.)

18. Roslavtseva S.A., Eremina O.Yu., Bakanova E.I., Polyakova Yu.B. Study of some enzyme systems in natural populations of houseflies Musca domestica highly resistant to organophosphorus insecticides. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Biological Series. 1993; (5): 722–731. (In Russ.)

19. Eremina O.Yu., Bakanova E.I., Roslavtseva S.A. Study of the possibilities of using some enzyme systems of natural populations of houseflies as biological indicators of environmental quality. Toxicological Bulletin. 1995; (1): 32–38. (In Russ.)

20. Eremina O.Yu., Bakanova E.I., Polyakova Yu.V., et al. Biochemical characteristics of natural populations of houseflies in connection with industrial and pesticide pollution of the environment. Agrochemistry. 1997; (9): 73–77. (In Russ.)

21. Roslavtseva S.A., Eremina O.Yu., Bakanova E.I., et al. Study of the mechanisms of insect resistance to insecticides (using natural populations of houseflies Musca domestica as an example). Agrochemistry. 1998; (10): 14–23. (In Russ.)

22. Davlianidze T.A., Eremina O.Yu., Olifer V.V. Insecticide resistance of the housefly Musca domestica in the central European part of Russia. Plant Protection Bulletin. 2022; 105(3): 114–121. https://doi.org/10.31993/2308-6459-2022-105-3-15346 https://elibrary.ru/lidwqd (In Russ.)

23. Naqqash M.N., Gökçe A., Bakhsh A., Salim M. Insecticide resistance and its molecular basis in urban insect pests. Parasitol. Res. 2016; 115(4): 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4898-9 https://elibrary.ru/knemyd

24. Melnichuk A.D., Krestonoshina K.S., Kinareykina A.G., et al. Analysis of insecticidal resistance to pyrethroids, organophosphorus compounds and carbamates in Musca domestica L. by the PCR-RFLP method. Veterinary Science Today. 2025; 14(1): 101–108. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2025-14-1-101-108 https://elibrary.ru/zltowz (In Russ.)

25. Levchenko M.A., Silivanova E.A., Khlyzova T.A., et al. Sensitivity of the natural population of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to pyrethroid insecticides. Russian Journal of Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology. 2017; (4): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2020-12-147-151 https://elibrary.ru/ymeyas (In Russ.)

26. Polyakova Yu.B. Housefly Musca domestica L. (Diptera, Muscidae) as a bioindicator of technogenic pollution of the environment. Entomological Review. 1998;77(2):289–294. https://elibrary.ru/hvfbbj (In Russ.)

27. Pavlov S.D., Pavlova R.P., Mavlyutov S.M. On the resistance of insects of the midge-housefly complex to the action of modern insecticides. In: Entomological studies in Northern Asia: Proceedings of VII Interregional meeting of entomologists of Siberia and the Far East within the framework of the Siberian Zoological Conference (Novosibirsk, September 20–24, 2006). Novosibirsk; 2006: 416–418. https://elibrary.ru/ttwhrz (In Russ.)

28. Davlianidze T.A., Eremina O.Yu., Olifer V.V. Intestinal action of modern insecticides on multi-resistant cultures of houseflies Musca domestica. Plant Protection Bulletin. 2023; 106(3): 156–164. https://doi.org/10.31993/2308-6459-2023-106-3-15487 https://elibrary.ru/mkvasp (In Russ.)

29. Scott J.G. Evolution of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Musca domestica. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017; 73(4): 716–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4328 https://elibrary.ru/wkcfnv

30. Roca-Acevedo G., Boscaro I., Toloza A.C. Global pattern of kdr-type alleles in Musca domestica (L.). Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2023; 10(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-022-00281-6 https://elibrary.ru/ibimxq

31. Silivanova E.A., Kinareykina A.G. Metabolic resistance to insecticides in the housefly Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). In: Conceptual and applied aspects of scientific research and education in the field of invertebrate zoology: collection of articles of the VI International Conference (Tomsk, October 20–23, 2025). Tomsk; 2025: 131–134. https://doi.org/10.17223/978-5-907890-82-4-2025-26 https://elibrary.ru/wbwyjr (In Russ.)

32. Levchenko M.A., Silivanova E.A., Plashkina V.A., et al. Resistance of natural populations of Musca domestica L. to modern insecticides. Russian Journal of Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology. 2019; (4): 407–412. https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.san.hyg.ecol.201904011 https://elibrary.ru/kfvdtw (In Russ.)

33. Levchenko M.A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of fipronil and chlorfenapyr against Musca domestica L. at veterinary inspection sites. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. 2020;(12):147–151. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2020-12-147-151 https://elibrary.ru/uceubi (In Russ.)

34. Levchenko M.A., Silivanova E.A., Shumilova P.A., Sennikova N.A. Insecticide susceptibility and enzymatic activity in Musca domestica L. natural populations. Problems of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology. 2021: 428–435. https://doi.org/10.36871/vet.san.hyg.ecol.202104008 https://elibrary.ru/vntmak (In Russ.)

35. Silivanova E.A., Shumilova P.A., Levchenko M.A. Sensitivity to insecticides and activity of detoxification enzymes in Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) of the natural population. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. 2020; (12): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2020-12-102-109 https://elibrary.ru/oizswv (In Russ.)

36. González-Morales M.A., DeVries Z.C., Santangelo R.G., et al. Multiple mechanisms confer fipronil resistance in the German cockroach: enhanced detoxification and Rdl mutation. J. Med. Entomol. 2022; 59(5): 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjac100 https://elibrary.ru/titaqp

37. Block C.J., Miles L.S., Lewis C.D., et al. First evidence of the A302S Rdl insecticide resistance mutation in populations of the bed bug, Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) in North America. J. Med. Entomol. 2025; 62(3): 740–744. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaf033 https://elibrary.ru/bomgst

38. Nurislamova A.R., Kinareykina A.G., Yangirova L.Ya., et al. Comparative toxicity of chlorfenapyr for Musca domestica adults of different lines. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. 2024; (12): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2024-12-113-120 https://elibrary.ru/pjwuua (In Russ.)

39. Ihara M. Ligand-gated ion channels as targets of neuroactive insecticides. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2022; 86(2): 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/bbb/zbab202 https://elibrary.ru/goruox

40. Sial M.U., Mehmood K., Saeed S., et al. Neonicotinoid's resistance monitoring, diagnostic mechanisms and cytochrome P450 expression in green peach aphid [Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)]. PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272184 https://elibrary.ru/sthkzu

41. Zhang K., Chen L., Chen J., et al. Mutation V65I in the β1 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor confers neonicotinoid and sulfoxaflor resistance in insects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024; 72(11): 5671–5681. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c09456 https://elibrary.ru/whxhgi

42. Abbas N., Ijaz M., Shad S.A., Binyameen M. Assessment of resistance risk to fipronil and cross resistance to other insecticides in the Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Vet. Parasitol. 2016; 223: 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.04.026

43. Abbas N., Khan H.A.A., Shad S.A. Resistance of the house fly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to lambda-cyhalothrin: mode of inheritance, realized heritability, and cross-resistance to other insecticides. Ecotoxicology. 2014; 23: 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1217-7 https://elibrary.ru/pdecoh


Review

For citations:


Eremina O.Yu., Olifer V.V. The Housefly Musca domestica: Evolution of Insecticide Resistance in Russia (Literature Review). Disinfectology. 2026;2(2):94-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47470/dez019. EDN: PEKGVT

Views: 95

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 3033-6465 (Print)
ISSN 3033-7739 (Online)